Response to Jackass; Other 9/11 commentary

Jack's response is just as I had expected. "Bob should be fired over this" is exact response I thought I'd get. It shows to me that he spent about 1/2 a millisecond on the evidence that the video links I added in the previous blog to support my position. It's how 98% of the public reacts when they hear of a 911 conspiracy or any conspiracy for that matter. The public, including Jack, has been conditioned to read and listen to the Corporate media as "they know" better then us and tell us what THEY want us to hear, so I'm not surprised. Jack, you proved my point.

Jack has the same mentality as a sheep, following the herd to the abyss. He's the one "lumping" me in with conspiracy theories that are a joke at best. He also MUST discredit me by bringing up other conspiracy theories that offer essentially ZERO percent proof and which, by the way, I know about but don't necessarily believe or follow them.

Thankfully, the events of 9/11 are well documented by the news media and there's a lot of video footage out there. Some of that coverage, by the way, was broadcast by the Corporate Media only once- on 9/11/2001 but not since. Fortunately, much of this footage was recorded by citizens on their VCRs on 9/11/2001 which now show up on Youtube/Google Video and are included in various 9/11 documentaries.

If any of you had the same reaction as Jack did, let me ask you:

Did you take 20 minutes and watch any of those links?

Did you open your mind up to something new that you may never have heard of before?

Do you conduct your daily life interactions in this same context?

Although I am disappointed in Jack, he's this way in the office. Like I said before, Jack's boss just released an online book with CONSPIRACY in the title... amazing. Jack should be the one fired as he is closed minded like most of the public.

One thing that Jack didn't mention (of course!) is that he told me that he found it odd that World Trade Center Building 7 collapsed at 5:20pm EDT on Sept 11th- 7 hours+ after the Twin Towers collapsed.

This tower symmetrically fell like a controlled demolition like an old Las Vegas casino and yet you can't use the excuse (as in the case of the Twin Towers) that a plane hit it!!!! Wow.

The World Trade Center Bldg. 7 videos on this page should get the people of the world fired up:

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/wtc7.html

It's a CONTROLLED DEMOLITION PEOPLE......

This article is about a building in Beijing that was engulfed in flames for HOURS last week and didn't collapse as did WTC Bldg 7:

http://www.infowars.com/911-cover-up-connection-black-boxes-found-15-hours-after-buffalo-crash/

The following article amazed me as well. Did any of you reading this know that NONE of the "Black Boxes" (Flight data recorders) of the airplanes involved in Sept. 11, 2001 were ever found? I didn't know this until Feb 14th...... They found the black box from that airplane crash in Buffalo, NY last Thursday but supposedly didn't find FOUR of them on 9/11......or were they secretly removed?

http://www.infowars.com/911-cover-up-connection-black-boxes-found-15-hours-after-buffalo-crash/

Wake up Jack!

-Bob

How Do You Spell Asshole with only 3 letters? B.O.B.

Did anyone read Bob's last blog? What an ass. He wants to throw Robert in with all the loony toon conspiracy theorists. Sure Robert's writing a book called "Conspiracy of the Rich". And while there has been hard evidence of a small group who run the monetary system and thus the world, I do wish Robert had not used the word Conspiracy. He could have called it Treason of the Rich or Subversion of the Rich.

The reason I hated the word conspiracy is because he would get lumped in with all the goons who think the world is run by reptile aliens, or that 911 was really done by George Bush with his holographic planes, or his missiles disguised as planes, or that the government is really trashing the US dollar so they can merge with Mexico (who the hell would want to merge with Mexico?).

Now Bob, who works for Robert has done just that. He's placed Robert with the fringe group psychos. I'd like to start a petition to fire his ass.

Everyone who thinks Bob should get fired please write in. Feel free to mention some other dumb conspiracy Bob probably believes in this week. Last week it was that Fluoride is put in the water to keep people stupid. This week its that the government has manufactured the global warming so they can tax us more. I think the week before had to do with a John F. Kennedy twin and the cloning of Elvis (turns out they genetically modified him to have black skin and his name is Jay-Z).

Yesterday Bob told me that the government is trying to genetically mutate woman into developing a third tit. Okay that ones probably true.

Jack B. PISSED OFF AT BOB

Robert's new book- Conspiracy of the Rich and 911 Conspiracy Evidence

Well FINALLY, someone with credibility and a reputation for challenging the status quo in finance comes through and uses the term "conspiracy" when talking about money. I'm referring to Robert Kiyosaki's latest free online book, "Conspiracy of the Rich" which became available online January 22nd, 2009. It was debated for months in the office here whether or not the term "conspiracy" should be used in the title.

This book is offered for free and a chapter will be added one at a time every couple of weeks. Readers have the ability to contribute their opinion(s) to the each chapter in a forum setting. Robert offered this book for free because this knowledge is vital to get out to the masses who desperately need it in these volatile economical times.

The word "conspiracy" evokes one response when read/heard. That the subject matter about to be spoken about just isn't true but it's a "THEORY". After all, MOST of us have all been conditioned that all conspiracies are just theories and couldn't possibly be true.

This is what I've faced in researching the events of 9/11/2001. No matter what video evidence I present to someone that asks valids questions regarding Sept 11th, I'm immediately shot down and discredited.

I do realize that this is a VERY controversial subject. The reason I'm bringing it up is that the mainstream media ignores this evidence and attacks the messenger instead of looking at the considerable evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.

My opinion is that you MUST take yourself out of the two party Democrat/Republican system and take a much larger view in order to look at this. This is what I've learned to do thanks to Robert.

Hence the following examples:

I can show video evidence that shows 17 seconds of explosion type noises coming from the second World Trade Center that fell BEFORE, yes BEFORE it starts to collapse. What do you think is going on here?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWMAgG3ESqE

I can show video evidence that World Trade Center Building #7 collapsed over 7 hours after the Twin Towers collapsed and looks like a Las Vegas casino controlled demolition vs. the building collapsed due to fire. (Watch this video and let me know if you really think a fire caused it to fall symmetrically as it did to the ground in 7 seconds or so).

9 seconds long #1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A

5 min #2:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0GW6QXKyp0

I can show you video evidence that WTC Building 7 fell at free fall speed (fell through itself) which is only possible in a controlled Demolition:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtqbaQWIr_Q

I can show video evidence that BBC America reported that World Trade Center Building #7 had collapsed 20 minutes before it actually did and the reporter is standing there reporting this as the building is still shown on video standing over her left shoulder. What's up with that?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BocsPiT-JQ

I can show photographic evidence that there are no jet airliner parts (wings/seats/luggage/people/fuselage, etc) remaining after a supposed crash of Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon.

Hunt the Boeing (at the Pentagon): http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm

Fox news/911 In Plane Site/ Jimmy Walter: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTzByLM1TTw

Further proof that the buildings were taken down by controlled demolition and the use of THERMATE/THERMITE was used to melt the steel beams:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wVLeKwSkXA

Thermite reaction here? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmuzyWC60eE

What do all of you think of this newly learned knowledge????

Do you think it's all BS because CNN/FOXNEWS/ABC/NBC/CBS/MSNBC/CNBC/the NY TIME/LA TIMES/WASHINGTON POST/etc didn't report any of this?

Give me some feedback here....

My point here is that just because you've never seen this point of view on 9/11/2001 does NOT mean it isn't true. The questions raised in the above videos/pictures are valid. The corporate media tells us what they want us to know. Period.

I hope some of you will come to the minimum conclusion that there are many more questions that haven't been answered related the Sept 11th events. As I said before, you've got to forget about Democrats and Republicans and that two party paradigm; otherwise you'll form an opinion based on one of these inept political parties.

Robert doesn't support/endorse anything I write here. However, he has put his name on a book with "Conspiracy" in the title. That's why I wrote on this subject. I I hope others will take this blog entry and learn something from it.

Could there be a conspiracy as Robert states in his book (www.conspiracyoftherich.com)? I believe to be be a real possibility. You'll have to make up your own mind.

I'm sure we'll be hearing from Jack on this. He is the most close-minded person at the RD Company and will put the screws to me on this. However, bear in mind that he's only spent about an hour or two on the subject if that talking with me/watching videos..... I do know that he has a hard time with World Trade Center Building 7 and how that thing collapsed the way it did... We'll see what he has to say....

Bob

Bob, Can you Spare A Square?

So this is the question for my friend Bob. . .

If the money is just being printed, who cares if we do a bailout? If they are just printing the money then how are our taxes paying for it? Paying for the ink? The paper?

I keep hearing these pretty little sound bites about “printing” money, but where’s the substance underneath?

So, Bob. What is the drama about? You say the government is “printing” money to save the banks, save the auto industry, save the porn industry, to save jobs in America. You would rather they let the façade drop and EVERYONE loses faith in the dollar, and only value gold and silver? Hell, there have been times when gold and silver had no value, back in the lands suffering from famine. Food is the original currency.

You would have us go back to that?

You go on with your pretty little sound bites and say how Americans are IDIOTS, but I can help but wonder why you still keep working day after day for your worthless paper.

I’ll gladly wipe my butt with your paycheck since its so worthless.

Jack B. Clenching

"Bailout" Amount- What's the truth??

As most of you have heard, the House of Representatives passed a $850 Billion bailout on October 3rd. The reality is that particular vote was $850 Billion yet it's referred to as the "$700 Billion Bailout".

I hope all of you take a look at this link because I'm sure you'll be in shock as to how much this "bailout" really is.

http://money.cnn.com/news/specials/storysupplement/bailout_scorecard/

(info from the link):
Do you really think there's $7.8 trillion sitting in some bank account?

I am amazed at the IDIOCY of the American public. Everytime we hear about a bailout, we are told that the "taxpayers" are paying for this. Are we that stupid to believe that there's an endless amount of money sitting in some account? The reality is that this money is being PRINTED OUT OF THIN AIR. PERIOD.

If we could print our way into prosperity, they would have done that in the 1970's.

Bob