Well FINALLY, someone with credibility and a reputation for challenging the status quo in finance comes through and uses the term "conspiracy" when talking about money. I'm referring to Robert Kiyosaki's latest free online book, "Conspiracy of the Rich" which became available online January 22nd, 2009. It was debated for months in the office here whether or not the term "conspiracy" should be used in the title.
This book is offered for free and a chapter will be added one at a time every couple of weeks. Readers have the ability to contribute their opinion(s) to the each chapter in a forum setting. Robert offered this book for free because this knowledge is vital to get out to the masses who desperately need it in these volatile economical times.
The word "conspiracy" evokes one response when read/heard. That the subject matter about to be spoken about just isn't true but it's a "THEORY". After all, MOST of us have all been conditioned that all conspiracies are just theories and couldn't possibly be true.
This is what I've faced in researching the events of 9/11/2001. No matter what video evidence I present to someone that asks valids questions regarding Sept 11th, I'm immediately shot down and discredited.
I do realize that this is a VERY controversial subject. The reason I'm bringing it up is that the mainstream media ignores this evidence and attacks the messenger instead of looking at the considerable evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.
My opinion is that you MUST take yourself out of the two party Democrat/Republican system and take a much larger view in order to look at this. This is what I've learned to do thanks to Robert.
Hence the following examples:
I can show video evidence that shows 17 seconds of explosion type noises coming from the second World Trade Center that fell BEFORE, yes BEFORE it starts to collapse. What do you think is going on here?
I can show video evidence that World Trade Center Building #7 collapsed over 7 hours after the Twin Towers collapsed and looks like a Las Vegas casino controlled demolition vs. the building collapsed due to fire. (Watch this video and let me know if you really think a fire caused it to fall symmetrically as it did to the ground in 7 seconds or so).
9 seconds long #1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A
5 min #2:
I can show you video evidence that WTC Building 7 fell at free fall speed (fell through itself) which is only possible in a controlled Demolition:
I can show video evidence that BBC America reported that World Trade Center Building #7 had collapsed 20 minutes before it actually did and the reporter is standing there reporting this as the building is still shown on video standing over her left shoulder. What's up with that?
I can show photographic evidence that there are no jet airliner parts (wings/seats/luggage/people/fuselage, etc) remaining after a supposed crash of Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon.
Hunt the Boeing (at the Pentagon): http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm
Fox news/911 In Plane Site/ Jimmy Walter: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTzByLM1TTw
Further proof that the buildings were taken down by controlled demolition and the use of THERMATE/THERMITE was used to melt the steel beams:
Thermite reaction here? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmuzyWC60eE
What do all of you think of this newly learned knowledge????
Do you think it's all BS because CNN/FOXNEWS/ABC/NBC/CBS/MSNBC/CNBC/the NY TIME/LA TIMES/WASHINGTON POST/etc didn't report any of this?
Give me some feedback here....
My point here is that just because you've never seen this point of view on 9/11/2001 does NOT mean it isn't true. The questions raised in the above videos/pictures are valid. The corporate media tells us what they want us to know. Period.
I hope some of you will come to the minimum conclusion that there are many more questions that haven't been answered related the Sept 11th events. As I said before, you've got to forget about Democrats and Republicans and that two party paradigm; otherwise you'll form an opinion based on one of these inept political parties.
Robert doesn't support/endorse anything I write here. However, he has put his name on a book with "Conspiracy" in the title. That's why I wrote on this subject. I I hope others will take this blog entry and learn something from it.
Could there be a conspiracy as Robert states in his book (www.conspiracyoftherich.com)? I believe to be be a real possibility. You'll have to make up your own mind.
I'm sure we'll be hearing from Jack on this. He is the most close-minded person at the RD Company and will put the screws to me on this. However, bear in mind that he's only spent about an hour or two on the subject if that talking with me/watching videos..... I do know that he has a hard time with World Trade Center Building 7 and how that thing collapsed the way it did... We'll see what he has to say....
Bob
1 comment:
Freak
Post a Comment